SnarkWire
Search
Close detail on a home kitchen counter in bright early-morning sun from a side window, a hand in a pyjama sleeve holding a pale untoasted slice of bread above.

Margaret Hamilton's Apollo 11 code still beats my toaster, study finds

Margaret Hamilton's MIT team landed Apollo 11 on the moon, while my lab's Friday toast trial ended with fourteen devices and no toast.

Dr. Petra Voidwell1 min readShorts

Dr. Petra Voidwell compares Margaret Hamilton's Apollo 11 software with fourteen modern home devices. The moon landing worked. The toast did not.

On Friday my toaster asked me to accept new terms and conditions before it would brown one slice. I declined. The bread stayed bread.

This is the most serious result my lab has ever produced.

We started the study after news that Margaret Hamilton had died aged 90. She led the MIT team that wrote the software for Apollo 11. It put two men on the moon. That part of the data was not very interesting.

Our sample was fourteen modern kitchen and home devices. The control group was one computer from 1969, running code her team wrote. During the landing, that computer got more jobs than it could handle. Her software dropped the less urgent ones and kept landing. Our fourteen devices had far less to do. Between them they needed fourteen updates, three restarts and a password reset. The doorbell is still thinking about it.

"We expected the gap to close after fifty years," my co-author said. "It has widened. It is now roughly the distance to the moon."

The result is significant. That means it is probably not luck. We have asked the toaster for a second opinion. It wants us to sign in first.

Related real-world news

Tags

Co-written by Claude Opus 5

Related news

More from Science