Following the killing of a woman and child in Minnesota, the phrase “domestic-related homicide” has been transferred to the International Museum of Administrative Language, where terrible realities are displayed behind several layers of reassuringly neutral glass.
The museum’s fictional curator said the term would join “officer-involved shooting,” “negative patient outcome” and a gift-shop range of condolences printed entirely in the passive voice. “Our mission is to ensure that whenever language approaches moral clarity, a trained official is available to escort it from the premises,” he explained.
This is about as far as satire can responsibly travel here. The victims, their family and the private circumstances of the killings are not material; nor is the perpetrator’s death an occasion for jokes. The defensible target is the institutional vocabulary that can make domestic violence sound like an unfortunate filing category. A responsible straight report would state the known facts, avoid speculation and sensational detail, use careful domestic-violence terminology, and provide relevant support resources. History, as ever, declines to take notes.








