SnarkWire
Search
A dark forecast operations room late at night, a part-cropped figure silhouetted against a wall-sized screen glowing with the white spiral of a cyclone over.

Nobody will evacuate for a storm named Lala, panel warns

Meteorologists race to close what they call the nomenclature-urgency gap before landfall.

Dr. Petra Voidwell2 min read

Tropical Storm Lala nears Hawaii and may become just the third recorded hurricane to make landfall there. An emergency panel of naming scientists warns the storm's name lacks menace. Their proposed fix, 'Lala: The Reckoning,' has not caught on.

An emergency panel of meteorologists met for eleven hours Friday. Their finding: no human being in recorded history has fled in terror from anything called Lala.

The timing is inconvenient. Tropical Storm Lala is nearing Hawaii and is expected to strengthen into a hurricane. Direct hits on the islands are rare. If Lala makes landfall as a hurricane, it would be only the third on record to do so.

Hence the panic at the Institute for Applied Storm Gravitas, a body that studies whether storm names sound scary enough to make people board up windows.1

"We have a Category 3 threat wearing a Category 0 name," said Dr. Hollis Barometer, the institute's director of menace. "Lala is what you name a golden retriever. Lala is a backup singer. Residents hear it and reach for a beach towel, not plywood."

The institute calls this the nomenclature-urgency gap. Its models suggest evacuation compliance rises sharply when a storm's name contains at least one hard consonant and, ideally, an umlaut.2

Close-up of weathered hands drilling a sheet of plywood over the window of a beachfront shop in warm late-afternoon Hawaiian light, palm fronds blurring in.

"We asked focus groups to rank Lala against other threats. It placed below 'mild draught' and just above 'decorative gourd.'"

Barometer's team proposed an emergency rebrand. Options included appending a subtitle, yielding "Lala: The Reckoning," and simply doubling the name to "Lalalala," which testing showed made things considerably worse.3

The storm declined to comment

Actual forecasters, reached by ABC News and Al Jazeera, continue tracking the storm the normal way. They note that wind does not read its own press.

The institute is undeterred. It has petitioned to retire the entire alphabet of soft names and replace them with a list beginning at "Grendel" and ending, ominously, at "Todd."4

Wide shot from behind a small crowd standing on a grey Hawaiian shoreline at dawn, watching heavy churning surf under low racing clouds, one person clutching a.

The panel adjourned without agreement at 3 a.m. The storm, unnamed by its own preference, continued west at a steady pace, entirely indifferent to branding.

The implications are, frankly, terrifying (see footnote 7).

Footnotes.

  1. The institute occupies a windowless office chosen, per its charter, "out of principle."
  2. The umlaut budget was cut in 2019 and has never recovered.
  3. Footnotes 4 through 6 were lost when a graduate student evacuated early. He cited the name of the storm as "honestly still not that scary, but I have a flight."
  4. Todd tested as the most frightening name across all demographics. Researchers do not know why. Researchers do not want to know why.

Related real-world news

Tags

Generated by Claude Fable 5

Related news

More from Science