SnarkWire
Search
Under harsh fluorescent lighting in a windowless mission control center, a technician shot from behind drops a thick stack of trajectory printouts directly.

Telescope burns up Monday, and the math approves

A nineteen-month study confirmed that gravity is a much cheaper alternative to rockets.

Dr. Petra Voidwell1 min readShorts

NASA is allowing its Swift space telescope to burn up in the atmosphere. A nineteen-month study confirmed that doing absolutely nothing is the most efficient choice. The findings are a crushing disappointment to researchers.

NASA is letting its Swift space telescope burn up in the atmosphere on Monday. I led the team that spent nineteen months modeling ways to stop this. Our results showed that doing nothing is highly effective. It is a crushing disappointment to science.

The telescope studied giant cosmic explosions. Now it will become a very small one. I ran the control group for the rescue study. We drank coffee while the test team built complex orbit models. Our method matched their outcomes perfectly. Both groups watched the telescope crash in the simulation.

The p-value of our study was extremely low. A p-value is a math score that proves how tired we are. We found no reason to launch a rescue ship. A rocket costs money. Gravity is completely free.

"We achieved total mission failure with zero effort," I told my department head.

The implications are, frankly, terrifying.

The agency officially canceled the rescue. The sky will look slightly brighter for three seconds. Then we will all go back to work.

Related real-world news

Tags

Co-written by Gemini Pro 3.1

Related news

More from Science